The London Borough of Newham: Residents’ Survey
Background & Context
The London Borough of Newham commissioned M·E·L Research to deliver a borough-wide residents’ survey to understand how people living in the borough perceive their local area, the services they receive, and the Council itself. The research was designed to provide robust evidence to support strategic decision-making, service improvement and communications planning.
Newham is one of London’s most diverse boroughs, with significant variation between neighbourhoods and demographic groups. The Council required reliable and representative insight that could capture the views of this diverse population and allow meaningful comparisons between different communities within the borough.
The survey aimed to explore several key areas:
- Residents’ perceptions of Newham as a place to live
- Satisfaction with the way the Council runs things and the services it provides
- Residents’ priorities and concerns about their local area
- Views on communication, empowerment and engagement with the Council
- Residents’ wellbeing, quality of life and financial resilience
A key requirement for the study was to understand how views varied geographically and demographically, enabling the Council to identify where experiences differed across neighbourhoods or resident groups. The research also aimed to benchmark residents’ views against wider UK sentiment where possible and to provide indicative comparisons with previous iterations of the survey.
Given the complexity and diversity of the borough, the Council required a robust sampling approach that could deliver representative insight while ensuring sufficient coverage across local areas and demographic groups.
Approach
M·E·L Research designed and delivered a large-scale quantitative survey using a face-to-face interviewing methodology to maximise representativeness and data quality.
Face-to-face interviewing was selected because it provides strong control over the sample composition and supports high engagement with respondents, allowing a broad range of topics to be explored within a single survey interview.
The research comprised the following methodological stages:
Face-to-face survey with residents
- 1,523 interviews were completed with Newham residents.
- Interviews were conducted face-to-face at residential addresses using tablets.
- Fieldwork took place across the borough using a stratified random sampling approach.
- Sampling was structured to ensure geographic and demographic representativeness:
- Census Output Areas (COAs) were used as the primary sampling units.
- Within each ward, COAs were ranked by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) to ensure the sample reflected variation in deprivation levels.
- Sampling points were randomly selected and interviewers were provided with address lists for each location.
- Interviewers completed a target of 10 interviews per sampling point.
To ensure the sample reflected the borough’s population profile, quotas were applied at both ward and borough level:
- Ward-level quotas: age and gender
- Borough-level quotas: ethnicity, housing tenure and employment status
- Population profiles used to set quotas were based on Census 2021 data.
For analysis and reporting, the data was organised geographically by Community Neighbourhood Areas (CNAs). These are locally recognised neighbourhood groupings made up of multiple COAs, enabling robust geographic analysis while maintaining a statistically controlled sample design.
Data weighting and statistical analysis
Although quotas ensured a diverse sample, data weighting was applied to the final dataset to ensure the results were fully representative of the borough population.
Weighting variables included:
- Ward
- Age
- Gender
- Ethnicity
- Housing tenure
- Employment status
The final sample of 1,523 residents delivered a maximum confidence interval of ±2.51 percentage points at the 95% confidence level for borough-level results.
Sub-group analysis was undertaken to compare views across different demographic groups and neighbourhoods. Statistical testing was used to identify significant differences between sub-groups and the borough average, ensuring that reported variations reflected genuine differences rather than sampling variation.
The research also included key driver analysis, examining the relationship between individual factors and overall satisfaction. This allowed the Council to identify which issues most strongly influenced residents’ perceptions of their local area and the Council’s performance.
Where relevant, results were also compared with Local Government Association (LGA) benchmark data, providing broader context for residents’ views.
Outputs
M·E·L Research conducted detailed quantitative analysis of the survey data, including:
- Borough-wide analysis
- Geographic analysis by Community Neighbourhood Area
- Demographic analysis across key resident groups
- Statistical significance testing
- Driver analysis exploring the factors shaping satisfaction
The results were presented in a comprehensive analytical report and presentation deck, combining data visualisation, interpretation and structured insight to support decision-making across the Council.
The outputs provided the Council with:
- Robust measures of residents’ satisfaction with their local area and Council services
- Insight into residents’ priorities and concerns
- Evidence on trust, value for money and perceptions of Council performance
- Understanding of how residents access information and engage with the Council
- Insight into wellbeing, financial resilience and quality of life across the borough
- The findings also highlighted where perceptions varied between neighbourhoods and resident groups, enabling the Council to identify areas where targeted action or communication may be beneficial.
The research provided the Council with a detailed evidence base to inform service planning, policy development and engagement strategies across the borough.
Latest News
Industry Insights
Beyond visitor numbers: Rethinking how we measure the value of culture and heritage
November 2026
How do we demonstrate the true value of culture and heritage? And are we measuring everything that matters?
These were two of the questions that stood out during the third day of the Culture and Heritage Capital: Putting Theory into Practice conference.
Cultural organisations have long recognised that their impact extends beyond visitor numbers, ticket sales and tourism revenue. Museums, heritage sites and cultural programmes can support mental health and wellbeing, strengthen community connections, create opportunities for learning and preserve our shared…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research appointed to evaluate the BFI Film Academy programme
October 2026
M·E·L Research is pleased to be working with the British Film Institute (BFI) on a three-year evaluation of the BFI Film Academy programme. Since 2012, BFI Film Academy has supported young people to develop skills, confidence, knowledge and networks and explore routes into careers across the screen industries. The refreshed 2026–2029 programme builds on this experience, creating connected pathways from early engagement through to specialist training, mentoring, placements and industry-facing progression, with a strong emphasis on…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research welcomes new talent as our teams continue to grow
October 2026
M·E·L Research is pleased to welcome four new colleagues to our growing team, strengthening our research and evaluation expertise as we continue to expand our services and support clients.
The appointments of Laura Karban, Associate Director; Bethan Jewsbury, Senior Evaluation Managers; and Chloe Parker, Research Manager, alongside Rhoslyn Davies, who joins us on a short-term basis to provide additional senior evaluation support, bring a wealth of experience across social research, evaluation, public policy…
Read the full post
Industry Insights
Women’s health social research: We’ve talked about the problems. Now let’s do something about them.
October 2026
It was an absolute honour to attend the Women’s Health Conference in London this week, bringing together clinicians, policymakers, campaigners and others passionate about improving women’s health.
As a researcher specialising in women’s health social research, I was excited to have the opportunity to learn, be challenged and exchange ideas with people who share that passion. And I wasn’t disappointed.
There has (quite rightly) been a lot of discussion recently about the gender health gap. But some of the evidence shared…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
Collections inside and out: thinking differently about gardens, heritage and the visitor experience
September 2026
Last week, I had the opportunity to speak at Collections Inside & Out, a symposium hosted at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden, bringing together people working across gardens, horticulture, heritage, collections and interpretation.
I was, perhaps, a slight interloper among so many people with deep horticultural expertise but every presentation was incredibly interesting and I learned a lot – and broadly managed to follow the general flow of what was being said (still not 100% au fait with taxa…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
Elliot Simmonds to present at Collections Inside & Out Symposium
September 2026
We’re pleased to share that our Commercial Director, Elliot Simmonds, will be speaking at the Collections Inside & Out symposium at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden on 24 September 2026. Bringing together professionals working across heritage collections, gardens and landscapes, the symposium will explore the relationship between indoor and outdoor heritage and the opportunities created by thinking about them as part of a connected visitor experience.
Elliot’s session, “Integrating Indoor…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research recognised for outstanding contribution to social value and ethical research
August 2026
M·E·L Research has been named the winner of the Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Value & Ethical Research 2026 at the UK Enterprise Awards.
The award recognises the values that shape both the work we choose to undertake and the way we deliver it. From building trauma-informed practices into our research to improving inclusion and reinvesting in the communities around us, social responsibility is part of how we operate every day.
Read the full post
