MACH Alliance: MACH and AI Research 2025
Background and context
MACH Alliance has historically tracked enterprise organisations’ adoption and use of MACH (Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native SaaS and Headless) technology. As MACH has become more widely adopted and AI uptake has accelerated across markets and sectors, the Alliance wanted to understand how MACH technology supports organisations to adopt AI in practice, what this means for business outcomes, and what role MACH Alliance can play in shaping the narrative and guidance in this evolving landscape.
The research was designed to help the Alliance answer a set of connected questions. It explored how AI-ready enterprise organisations are; the extent to which composable/MACH architecture is seen as an enabler for AI at scale; whether organisations that are more advanced with MACH report stronger AI-driven business outcomes; and where the main friction points sit (for example governance, integration complexity, talent and skills gaps, and organisational readiness). It also provided evidence to support decisions about the Alliance’s positioning, such as standards, guardrails, and messages the Alliance can credibly own and communicate to members and the wider market.
Approach
MACH Alliance set the initial direction by proposing the research questions and objectives. M·E·L Research translated these into a structured quantitative survey, working collaboratively with the client to refine wording, flow, and emphasis, so that the questionnaire reflected the Alliance’s priorities and language. M·E·L Research then programmed the survey in-house and managed fieldwork, using a leading online panel partner to reach the required senior decision-maker audience efficiently and consistently across markets.
Methodologies and stages of delivery were as follows:
Phase 1
• A c. 10-minute online quantitative survey was delivered to IT decision makers via an online panel partner.
• Sample: n=105 IT decision makers in the retail / (e-)commerce sector across the US and UK.
• Phase 1 acted as an initial pilot of the questionnaire in-market; a small number of questions were optimised based on learnings from this first wave, before scaling the study into Phase 2.
Phase 2
• The core survey approach remained consistent, with the optimised elements incorporated following Phase 1.
• Sample: n=495 IT decision makers, with a broader coverage of sectors and markets.
• Phase 1 and Phase 2 results were combined for a total reporting base of n=600, enabling robust overall findings and meaningful subgroup analysis where base sizes allowed.
Audience profile and coverage
• Participants were IT decision makers working in enterprise organisations meeting large-scale thresholds (for example, 5,000+ employees or at least $500m global annual turnover). This ensured the evidence reflected the realities of complex, multi-system organisations where architecture choices and AI adoption are strategic considerations.
• Coverage spanned multiple markets (including North America, the UK, France, Germany, Australia and Singapore), supporting comparisons by geography and helping MACH Alliance speak credibly to global members and stakeholders.
• The respondent group included seniority bands up to C-suite/VP levels, as well as specialist leadership roles (for example digital transformation, customer experience, IT leadership, eCommerce leadership, and enterprise architecture). This mix ensured the outputs captured both strategic viewpoints (investment priorities, governance, and outcomes) and implementation realities (integration, tooling, and operating models).
Outputs
M·E·L Research cleaned, processed and tabulated the survey dataset and then analysed the findings in line with MACH Alliance’s objectives. The analysis was designed to be accessible to readers who are not close to the project, while still offering the depth expected by a technical and senior decision-maker audience.
The deliverables focused on providing a clear evidence base that MACH Alliance can use across communications and decision-making. Outputs included:
• A structured written report that brought together headline metrics, supporting charts, and interpretation against the Alliance’s core questions (AI readiness, the enabling role of composable/MACH, and the relationship between MACH maturity and reported AI outcomes).
• Subgroup analysis and comparison cuts (for example by market, sector, organisational characteristics and maturity levels), with appropriate caution where bases were smaller and so results more indicative.
• Open-text insight that was systematically coded to reveal common themes, language and priorities, adding depth and context to quantitative results. This allows MACH Alliance to understand not only “what” respondents say, but also “how” they describe barriers, enablers and governance needs in their own words.
The overall output was designed to be used as a practical asset for MACH Alliance, supporting messaging, thought leadership, and discussions with members and stakeholders, grounded in a robust, enterprise-focused decision-maker sample and delivered through a transparent and repeatable approach.
Latest News
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research welcomes new talent as our teams continue to grow
October 2026
M·E·L Research is pleased to welcome four new colleagues to our growing team, strengthening our research and evaluation expertise as we continue to expand our services and support clients.
The appointments of Laura Karban, Associate Director; Bethan Jewsbury, Senior Evaluation Managers; and Chloe Parker, Research Manager, alongside Rhoslyn Davies, who joins us on a short-term basis to provide additional senior evaluation support, bring a wealth of experience across social research, evaluation, public policy…
Read the full post
Industry Insights
Women’s health social research: We’ve talked about the problems. Now let’s do something about them.
October 2026
It was an absolute honour to attend the Women’s Health Conference in London this week, bringing together clinicians, policymakers, campaigners and others passionate about improving women’s health.
As a researcher specialising in women’s health social research, I was excited to have the opportunity to learn, be challenged and exchange ideas with people who share that passion. And I wasn’t disappointed.
There has (quite rightly) been a lot of discussion recently about the gender health gap. But some of the evidence shared…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
Collections inside and out: thinking differently about gardens, heritage and the visitor experience
September 2026
Last week, I had the opportunity to speak at Collections Inside & Out, a symposium hosted at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden, bringing together people working across gardens, horticulture, heritage, collections and interpretation.
I was, perhaps, a slight interloper among so many people with deep horticultural expertise but every presentation was incredibly interesting and I learned a lot – and broadly managed to follow the general flow of what was being said (still not 100% au fait with taxa…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
Elliot Simmonds to present at Collections Inside & Out Symposium
September 2026
We’re pleased to share that our Commercial Director, Elliot Simmonds, will be speaking at the Collections Inside & Out symposium at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden on 24 September 2026. Bringing together professionals working across heritage collections, gardens and landscapes, the symposium will explore the relationship between indoor and outdoor heritage and the opportunities created by thinking about them as part of a connected visitor experience.
Elliot’s session, “Integrating Indoor…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research recognised for outstanding contribution to social value and ethical research
August 2026
M·E·L Research has been named the winner of the Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Value & Ethical Research 2026 at the UK Enterprise Awards.
The award recognises the values that shape both the work we choose to undertake and the way we deliver it. From building trauma-informed practices into our research to improving inclusion and reinvesting in the communities around us, social responsibility is part of how we operate every day.
Read the full post
Industry Insights
Progress, persistence and the gaps in suicide prevention knowledge
August 2026
New UK-wide research from M·E·L Research’s SPARK report shows improving mental health indicators alongside continuing exposure to suicide, widespread lifetime suicidal thoughts and significant gaps in practical knowledge.
Suicide prevention depends on understanding not only how many people are affected, but also how confident the public feel about recognising risk, starting difficult conversations and finding appropriate support. The Spring 2026 SPARK report from M·E·L Research brings these issues together, providing a detailed picture of attitudes…
Read the full post
