British Dyslexia Association: Research with Dyslexic NEETs
The British Dyslexia Association (BDA) commissioned M·E·L Research to explore the lived experiences of dyslexic young people aged 18–24 who were not in employment, education or training (NEET). The research was undertaken in the context of increasing national concern about the rising number of young people who are NEET and growing policy interest in understanding the multiple factors contributing to this issue. Existing evidence highlighted that educational attainment, socio-economic disadvantage and Special Educational Needs (SEN) were important predictors of NEET status. The BDA wanted to understand the specific role that dyslexia may play within this wider picture and identify opportunities for schools, employers, support services and policymakers to improve outcomes for dyslexic young people.
The study sought to build an evidence base around how dyslexia influences confidence, educational experiences, aspirations and transitions into employment, while recognising that NEET status is often shaped by multiple interconnected factors rather than a single cause. Particular attention was given to identifying barriers experienced within education and recruitment processes, as well as understanding how these systems could better support young people with dyslexia.
Approach
M·E·L Research designed and delivered a qualitative research programme in close collaboration with the British Dyslexia Association. The research materials were developed jointly to ensure they addressed the client’s objectives while allowing participants to discuss their experiences openly and in depth.
The project included the following stages:
Research design and discussion guide development: M·E·L Research drafted a comprehensive qualitative discussion guide which was reviewed collaboratively with the British Dyslexia Association. The guide provided a consistent framework for exploring participants’ educational experiences, transition into employment, confidence, aspirations and support needs.
Participant recruitment: M·E·L Research developed a recruitment screener, again reviewed collaboratively with the client, to ensure recruitment criteria aligned with the research objectives. Recruitment was undertaken by M·E·L Research’s specialist fieldwork partner.
In-depth qualitative interviews: M·E·L Research conducted ten in-depth interviews with young people aged 18–24 who were not in employment, education or training. Interviews were conducted either online via Microsoft Teams or by telephone according to participants’ preferences and accessibility requirements, helping maximise inclusion and participation.
Participant profile: The research included participants from across England, representing a range of ages, genders and ethnic backgrounds. The sample included individuals with dyslexia alone, as well as participants with co-occurring neurodivergent conditions including ADHD and Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC), reflecting the complexity of participants’ lived experiences. The sample also captured a range of personal circumstances, including care experience and socio-economic disadvantage where relevant to participants’ journeys.
Throughout the project, the qualitative approach enabled participants to share detailed personal accounts of their experiences from school through to seeking employment. This provided rich insight into how educational support, or the absence of it, influenced later outcomes and how recruitment processes could present additional barriers for dyslexic young people.
Outputs
Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis, allowing M·E·L Research to identify recurring patterns, shared experiences and key themes across the participant group while addressing each of the client’s research objectives. The analysis explored the relationship between educational experiences, confidence, attainment, aspirations and transitions into employment, while recognising the wider social and personal factors influencing participants’ lives.
The findings were presented in a comprehensive written research report that combined qualitative evidence with participant quotations to illustrate key themes. The report also positioned the findings within the broader national policy context by referencing existing evidence relating to NEET status, enabling the client to demonstrate how the qualitative findings complemented wider research.
The research demonstrated that many participants experienced late identification or non-identification of dyslexia, inconsistent educational support and learning environments that were not adapted to their needs. Participants described how these experiences affected educational attainment, confidence, mental wellbeing and subsequent progression into employment or further education. The findings also highlighted that most participants remained motivated to work or continue learning, but encountered additional barriers during recruitment, particularly where processes relied heavily on reading, writing and text-based assessments.
The report generated a series of evidence-based recommendations for government, education providers and employers. These included improving early identification of dyslexia, strengthening teacher awareness and implementation of educational adjustments, providing greater support during transitions into employment, improving accessibility within recruitment processes and increasing employer understanding of dyslexia and neurodiversity. Recommendations also highlighted opportunities for Jobcentres, youth employment services and employers to provide practical support with applications, reasonable adjustments and careers guidance that better reflected the strengths of dyslexic young people.
The research provided the British Dyslexia Association with qualitative evidence to support its wider policy and influencing work, amplifying the voices of dyslexic young people while informing discussions around education, employment and reducing the risk of young people becoming NEET.
Fraud. AI-generated responses. Professional survey respondents. In recent years, these have become some of the most widely discussed topics within the research industry. As digital methodologies have evolved, so too have the challenges associated with maintaining confidence in the data we collect.
While our approach to managing data quality in social research must continue to evolve, confidence in research still depends on the same foundations: clear objectives, robust methodology, appropriate quality assurance, professional judgement and ultimately, impact.
We are delighted to be working with Theos, the religion and society think tank, on an important new research project examining how people in Britain understand and navigate today’s emerging moral issues. Madeleine Pennington, Head of Research at Theos, commented: “We are pleased to be partnering with M·E·L Research on this timely and ambitious study. We are excited to generate new evidence about how people across Britain think about…
At M·E·L Research, we believe the strongest neuroinclusive social research is accessible by design. As part of this commitment, every member of our team recently completed specialist neurodiversity training with Enna Global, a leading neurodiversity and neuroinclusion consultancy.
The training marked the beginning of a wider collaboration. We’re delighted to be partnering with Enna Global to further…
We are pleased to announce the appointment of Senior Evaluation Lead Liz Murphy, alongside two new Insights Executives, Jamie Bains and Olivia Smith.
These appointments reflect our continued growth and investment in exceptional talent across our research delivery team. Together, Liz, Jamie and Olivia bring expertise spanning public policy, evaluation, social research, consumer insight, and culture and heritage, further strengthening our ability…
As artificial intelligence continues to transform industries across the world, it is easy to assume that technology will eventually replace the human role in research.
There is no question that AI is changing the way research is conducted and will continue to as technology develops. From automating repetitive tasks to analysing large datasets at speed, it is already improving efficiency across the market and social research industry. However, when the focus shifts from processing information to understanding people, human expertise remains indispensable.
Social research is fundamentally… social. It is about understanding humans’ motivations, fears…
I should probably start with a caveat. This is not a serious constitutional proposal. Or at least, it wasn’t when I started writing it. It began as a slightly tongue-in-cheek response to the latest instalment in what now feels like Britain’s longest-running political drama: “Who is in Number 10 this week?”
That might sound like an odd starting point for a piece on a research agency website. But many of our clients at M·E·L Research operate in spaces that are directly shaped by political decision-making: health, education, local government, regulation, justice, transport, skills, the environment and public services more broadly. For them, who makes decisions matters. So does how long those decisions…
New research conducted by M·E·L Research for the Molly Rose Foundation suggests that many young people continue to encounter harmful suicide, self-harm, depression and eating disorder content online, despite protections introduced under the Online Safety Act.
The research suggests that, despite significant regulatory changes, many children continue to encounter harmful content as part of their everyday online lives. A key question in the ongoing debate is the extent to which recommender feeds drive children’s exposure to harmful content.
The findings arrive at a time of intense debate about how best to protect children online…
We are pleased to see the publication of a new research report for the Legal Services Board (LSB) titled ‘AI in Legal Services’ exploring the opportunities and risks associated with AI in legal services. As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in everyday life, more consumers are turning to AI-powered tools for help with legal issues such as housing disputes, employment rights, debt and family matters. For many people who cannot afford traditional legal advice, these technologies offer a potentially transformative route to understanding their rights and accessing support.
