University of Birmingham: Evaluation of the Binley Cycleway
Background and context
M·E·L Research delivered the final wave of a multi-year evaluation for the Centre for Economics and Obesity at the University of Birmingham, focused on the Binley Cycleway. The work formed part of a programme that started with a baseline survey and then continued through annual tracking waves, enabling year-on-year comparison of attitudes towards and/or usage of the cycleway.
The client’s core need was to understand how effectively the cycleway was supporting cycling uptake and the associated health and wellbeing of the local population. Alongside cycleway awareness, attitudes and behaviour, the survey also gathered a wide set of demographic and health-related measures (including lifestyle choices, quality of life and wellbeing indicators). This introduced a key challenge: collecting sensitive personal information at scale, while maintaining participant confidence and robust data quality. M·E·L addressed this by using a mixed-mode approach that combined self-completion with face-to-face interviewing, described in the technical report as the most appropriate approach given both the large sample requirements and the sensitivity of the health information being collected.
Approach
M·E·L designed and delivered a cross-sectional survey wave using a combination of postal/online self-completion and in-person interviewing, supported by a structured sampling framework and clear participant communications.
Methodologies (distinct components)
Resident survey (stratified random sample, mixed-mode self-completion + tablet-assisted face-to-face)
• Sample & eligibility: A random sample of 20,000 Coventry residential addresses (private households) was selected, stratified by Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) decile and by distance-based buffer zones from the cycleway route. Business addresses were excluded. Only one adult (18+) could take part per household. • Geography / buffers: Buffer zone 1 covered households within one mile of the route; buffer zone 2 covered households one to two miles from the route (excluding buffer 1 to avoid duplicate contact). Each buffer included 10,000 households. • Questionnaire design for comparability: The resident questionnaire was kept consistent to maintain comparability across waves, with the technical report noting only an update to the map to reflect the final stage completion. • Recruitment and fieldwork stages: Two initial mailout approaches were used:
a) Postcard invitation (60% of sampled households): 12,000 households received a postcard inviting online completion via QR code, plus a link to a cover letter explaining the commissioning and delivery partners. b) Full postal survey pack (40% of sampled households): 8,000 households received a cover letter, an 8-page paper questionnaire, and a business reply envelope. Both routes included QR code access to a participant information sheet. c) Booster face-to-face interviewing: After the mailout, M·E·L deployed a field team to conduct 400 face-to-face interviews to boost participation proportionately across all areas, using the original sample list and removing addresses that had already responded or declined (to avoid unnecessary re-contact). d) Workplace survey (open-link online survey with organisations on the route)
• Rationale: A secondary survey strand captured views of workers at organisations along the cycleway corridor, recognising that commuting patterns could be affected even when employees lived outside Coventry. Sample approach: Nine organisations were approached with the survey link (including major local employers and institutions). • Design and access: The workplace survey was kept consistent with previous waves and was shared as an open link. This reduced the need for personal information to access the survey but limited the ability to de-duplicate responses or fully control who completed it.
Encouraging participation (both strands)
M·E·L supported engagement through transparent communications about the value of participation, clear confidentiality information in the cover letter and participant information sheet, a named contact route via a dedicated email address, and an incentive prize draw.
Outputs (processing, datasets, and reporting)
M·E·L’s technical reporting documented the methodology, sampling, data processing and achieved returns, and included the full questionnaire and participant materials as appendices (survey, postcard invite, cover letter, and participant information sheet).
On the data side, M·E·L implemented a structured quality process: sampled households receiving postal packs had unique survey numbers to link responses to buffer zone, sub-sample type and IMD decile; returned paper questionnaires were registered via scanned barcodes and then manually data-entered with at least 5% back-checked using double entry. For online data, survey logic checks and input ranges were built into the programming and mirrored for paper capture; partial completions were assessed and treated as complete if respondents provided answers up to the halfway point, and “end screen but not submitted” cases were treated as complete. The dataset was cleaned and collated, with some responses retained despite invalid IDs to support completeness and comparability across waves, and then sent securely to the University of Birmingham for analysis.
In terms of achieved responses across all channels, M·E·L delivered 996 completed surveys in total: 354 online (36%), 229 postal (23%), 402 face-to-face (40%), and 10 workplace (1%). The project approach also used unique household IDs to prevent duplication across modes (e.g., where someone received a paper pack but completed online, or was later interviewed face-to-face).
How do we demonstrate the true value of culture and heritage? And are we measuring everything that matters?
These were two of the questions that stood out during the third day of the Culture and Heritage Capital: Putting Theory into Practice conference.
Cultural organisations have long recognised that their impact extends beyond visitor numbers, ticket sales and tourism revenue. Museums, heritage sites and cultural programmes can support mental health and wellbeing, strengthen community connections, create opportunities for learning and preserve our shared…
M·E·L Research is pleased to be working with the British Film Institute (BFI) on a three-year evaluation of the BFI Film Academy programme. Since 2012, BFI Film Academy has supported young people to develop skills, confidence, knowledge and networks and explore routes into careers across the screen industries. The refreshed 2026–2029 programme builds on this experience, creating connected pathways from early engagement through to specialist training, mentoring, placements and industry-facing progression, with a strong emphasis on…
M·E·L Research is pleased to welcome four new colleagues to our growing team, strengthening our research and evaluation expertise as we continue to expand our services and support clients.
The appointments of Laura Karban, Associate Director; Bethan Jewsbury, Senior Evaluation Managers; and Chloe Parker, Research Manager, alongside Rhoslyn Davies, who joins us on a short-term basis to provide additional senior evaluation support, bring a wealth of experience across social research, evaluation, public policy…
It was an absolute honour to attend the Women’s Health Conference in London this week, bringing together clinicians, policymakers, campaigners and others passionate about improving women’s health.
As a researcher specialising in women’s health social research, I was excited to have the opportunity to learn, be challenged and exchange ideas with people who share that passion. And I wasn’t disappointed.
There has (quite rightly) been a lot of discussion recently about the gender health gap. But some of the evidence shared…
We are pleased to be working with the MS Society on new health and care social research exploring how health and care services can better support people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and help reduce avoidable hospital admissions.
The health and care social research study will focus on opportunities for earlier intervention and more coordinated, preventative support, while recognising that hospital admission is sometimes clinically necessary. It will…
Last week, I had the opportunity to speak at Collections Inside & Out, a symposium hosted at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden, bringing together people working across gardens, horticulture, heritage, collections and interpretation.
I was, perhaps, a slight interloper among so many people with deep horticultural expertise but every presentation was incredibly interesting and I learned a lot – and broadly managed to follow the general flow of what was being said (still not 100% au fait with taxa…
We’re pleased to share that our Commercial Director, Elliot Simmonds, will be speaking at the Collections Inside & Out symposium at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden on 24 September 2026. Bringing together professionals working across heritage collections, gardens and landscapes, the symposium will explore the relationship between indoor and outdoor heritage and the opportunities created by thinking about them as part of a connected visitor experience.
Elliot’s session, “Integrating Indoor…
M·E·L Research has been named the winner of the Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Value & Ethical Research 2026 at the UK Enterprise Awards.
The award recognises the values that shape both the work we choose to undertake and the way we deliver it. From building trauma-informed practices into our research to improving inclusion and reinvesting in the communities around us, social responsibility is part of how we operate every day.
