Research & Evaluation
Social Research ¦ Market Research ¦ Behavioural Insight ¦ Evaluation ¦ SROI
At M·E·L Research, we deliver specialist online harms market research, social research, evaluation and learning partnerships that support regulators, charities, government departments and policy bodies to understand exposure, risk, behaviour and impact in digital environments.
Our work supports organisations that are responding to the Online Safety Act and other digital regulatory changes, helping them to understand what works and in what contexts.
We research across the online harms landscape, including focuses adults, young people and children engaging with or exposed to harmful online content.
Our research supports better decision making in areas such as:
Our approach is thorough, thoughtful and stays closely connected to people’s real experiences, which means our insights are grounded, responsible, and practical to inform real decisions.
Our online harms research clients include Ofcom, NSPCC, Samaritans, the Molly Rose Foundation, the Jordan Legacy, and SPARK.

Researching online harms requires more than technical expertise. It requires safeguarding expertise, trauma informed design and a strong understanding of regulatory frameworks.
Our work is grounded in:
We partner with organisations that require robust evidence without compromising dignity, safety or participant wellbeing.
Research to support Online Safety Act duties:
Our research helps regulators and policymakers translate lived experience into proportionate, evidence-based regulation. We design and deliver research that supports regulatory bodies and policy teams implementing duties under the Online Safety Act, including:
Children’s exposure to harmful content research
We conduct specialist research exploring how children encounter and experience harmful content online.
This includes:
Adult engagement with harmful online content
We deliver qualitative and mixed methods research exploring adult engagement with suicide, self-harm and eating disorder content online.
This includes:
Mixed methods and realist approaches in digital contexts
Online harms exist within complex digital systems. Our research is designed to reflect that complexity.
We deliver:
Value for money and funding accountability:
Where required, we develop SROI and Value for Money frameworks and judgement matrices that meet funder and government requirements.
We have extensive experience delivering evaluation and learning across the online harms landscape, including:
Ofcom: Exploring Adults’ Engagement with Suicide, Self Harm and Eating Disorder Online Content
We delivered qualitative research exploring adults’ personal experiences of engaging with harmful online content. The findings contributed to Ofcom’s broader evidence base supporting implementation of the Online Safety Act.
The research examined:
Molly Rose Foundation: Children’s Exposure to Suicide and Self Harm Content on Social Media
M·E·L Research was commissioned to understand the exposure that children have to self-harm, suicide, depression and eating disorder content on social media. This work contributed to strengthening protections for children in digital spaces.
The research supported understanding of:
NSPCC: Child Online Safety in Diverse Family Settings
M·E·L Research was commissioned by NSPCC to explore how different family structures experience and manage child online safety, helping to inform more inclusive support and safeguarding strategies. This work contributed to strengthening child online safety by ensuring support and guidance better reflects the realities and needs of diverse family experiences.
The research supported understanding of:
If you are working through your Online Safety Act responsibilities, supporting digital safety initiatives or shaping policy around online harms, then we would love to work with you.
Get in touch to discuss how M·E·L Research can support your next phase of online harms research, evaluation or learning.
Ready to take the next step and learn how we can assist your business with market research and analysis?