Project Announcement: Understanding Public Perspectives on Marine Decommissioning
We’re pleased to be supporting the READ-ME (Research to Explore Attitudes and Perceptions to Decommissioning in the Marine Environment) project, funded by INSITE North Sea as part of the INSITE Phase 3 programme ( Phase 3 – Research Projects – INSITE North Sea).
This collaborative initiative brings together a strong partnership of organisations, led by Prof Sian Rees at the University of Plymouth, in partnership with the University of Aberdeen, the National Decommissioning Centre, and specialist consultancy partners. Together, the team is working to build a clearer understanding of how the public and stakeholders perceive decommissioning across a range of marine contexts, including offshore energy infrastructure and shipwreck management, and how those views evolve when informed by evidence.
Dr Paula Duffy, University of Aberdeen said of the project:
“Decommissioning in the marine environment sits at the intersection of environmental responsibility, economic reality and public trust. If we want to make better, more sustainable decisions, we need to bring people with us. This project is particularly valuable because it goes beyond simply capturing headline opinions. It takes the extra step of exploring how and why perspectives might change when people are given the opportunity to engage with information that is clear, balanced and grounded in evidence. By creating space for people to reflect and respond to different scenarios, the research helps build a more informed picture of public attitudes – one that recognises the role that understanding plays in shaping views, rather than relying on initial reactions alone.”
Approach
At the heart of the project is the development and delivery of a scientifically robust, stakeholder-informed online survey designed to capture both baseline attitudes and how these change following exposure to evidence-based information.
The survey builds on established tools such as the UK Ocean Literacy Survey and an extensive review of over 30 related studies spanning environmental, marine, heritage and decommissioning themes.
In practice, the research will involve:
Gathering demographic data and exploring core values across environmental, marine, heritage and energy topics
Measuring baseline perceptions of decommissioning in the marine environment
Presenting respondents with a series of carefully designed narrative scenarios (approximately 10–13), each supported by concise evidence summaries and visuals
Capturing how attitudes and preferences shift after engaging with these scenarios
The survey has been carefully designed to balance depth and accessibility, with streamlined content to encourage engagement and minimise drop-off. M·E·L Research will lead on fieldwork, delivering a nationally representative sample of 1,600 participants through trusted panel partners, alongside rigorous quality assurance throughout. The survey will also be tested at the SIME conference ( SIME 2026 – INSITE North Sea ) and through cognitive testing with members of the public to ensure clarity and effectiveness.
Why is this research is important?
As the UK continues to navigate the transition of its marine and energy landscapes, decisions around decommissioning are becoming increasingly visible and consequential. However, public understanding of these issues – and the trade-offs involved – can be limited. This research is important because it goes beyond simply measuring opinion; it explores how informed understanding shapes attitudes. The findings will provide valuable, evidence-based insight to support more transparent communication, better policy development, and more inclusive decision-making across the sector.
“We are pleased to be supporting the READ-ME project, which brings together academic, sector and research expertise to address a complex area. Our focus is on delivering a robust and reliable evidence base, supporting a clearer understanding of public perceptions of decommissioning and how these may change when informed by relevant information. M·E·L Research is well placed to contribute to this work, drawing on our experience in designing and delivering large-scale surveys, testing communications, and capturing attitudinal change across environmental and energy-related topics.”
Need support with your own social research?
Whether you’re a public body, charity, or organisation looking to understand your audience, evaluate impact, or inform future strategies, we’re here to help.
Get in touch with the M·E·L Research team today via our ‘Get in touch’ form below to see how our expert researchers can support your goals. Alternatively, you can email the team at info@melresearch.co.uk.
When people think about the Invictus Games, they often picture medals, competition and international sport. But our independent evaluation of the Royal British Legion’s (RBL) Team UK Invictus Games Programme showed something much deeper at work: a carefully designed recovery journey that supports wounded, injured and sick serving personnel and veterans – and the people around them – long before and long after the…
It’s a been a big week for women’s sport in the UK. The Women’s Six Nations kicked off this past weekend, while the Lionesses took on a World Cup qualifier on Tuesday night in a repeat of the Euro 2025 final. Both matches aired on BBC One, underlining the growing prominence and mainstream appeal of England’s women’s teams in the last few years. This moment is part of a much broader surge in visibility and investment. From the UEFA European Women’s Championship 2022…
M·E·L Research is proud to be working with the University of York’s Heritage for Global Challenges Research Centre on the ‘Heritage and Cultural Capital in Contemporary Britain’ project (generously funded by The Leverhulme Trust (Grant: LIP-2021-003)). This important study builds on work conducted in the early 2000s, including the ESRC-funded ‘Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion’ project (2003–2005)…
I will preface this by saying I am old enough – despite looking about 12 – to remember the rise of online surveys, the ‘death’ of face-to-face qual (remember that, after COVID) and ‘Big Data Will Take Your Job’ chat. New tools and approaches emerge all the time and that is something to be celebrated – it pushes us forward.
There is a lot of excitement at the moment about AI in research. Some of it is justified. Some of it I am less enamoured with – certainly when factoring in the work we do at M·E·L Research. Used well, AI can save time. It can help with admin. It can help sort, sift, tag and summarise. And yes, there are probably…
M·E·L Research is pleased to be working with the Molly Rose Foundation on the second wave of a major research study exploring how children and young people encounter harmful content on social media, and how patterns of exposure are evolving over time. This project takes a uniquely in-depth look into four specific themes of harmful content: suicide, self-harm, depression…
M·E·L Research is expanding once again! Following a successful period of growth, we’re excited to announce two new opportunities for experienced research professionals. We’re looking for talented senior social researchers to join our team. If you’re passionate about using evidence and insights to make a meaningful difference to people, communities and public services, we’d love to hear from you.
M·E·L Research is delighted to be working with the British Dyslexia Association once again, this time on a new study exploring the experiences of adults with dyslexia in the workplace. This research will build a deeper understanding of how dyslexia impacts working lives, with a particular focus on employment, inclusion and participation. The study will generate robust evidence to help inform future policy…
Yesterday, I attended the MRS Conference 2026, where this year’s theme was “Research on the Edge: Building Our Futures.” The event brought together researchers, strategists and industry leaders to explore how insight is evolving in a world shaped by rapid technological change, shifting trust and increasingly complex audiences. Across the day’s sessions, several themes came through strongly. AI was a constant presence in the discussion, but so were questions about trust, demographics and the enduring value of human insight.
