Barnardo’s: Evaluation of The Children and Young People’s Health Equity Collaborative (CHEC)
The Children and Young People’s Health Equity Collaborative (CHEC) was a three-year partnership between Barnardo’s, the UCL Institute of Health Equity (IHE), and three Integrated Care Systems (ICSs) – NHS Birmingham and Solihull, NHS Cheshire and Merseyside, and NHS South Yorkshire. Its vision was that all children should enjoy good health and positive wellbeing, reduce child health inequalities and improve the outcomes for CYP from underserved communities by acting on the social determinants of health.
The CHEC sought to demonstrate how health systems can meaningfully strengthen child health equity through action on the social determinants of health, working in partnerships with, local government, and voluntary, community and social enterprise (VCSE) partners, while embedding the views of children and young people (CYP) into strategic decision-making.
Methods
The evaluation of the CHEC was designed to capture both outcomes and learning, using a mixed methods approach across the three participating ICSs. Data collection included:
▪ Document review of ICS board papers, strategic plans, reflective diaries (completed by ICSs, Barnardo’s and IHE), and internal programme reports.
▪ Interviews and focus groups with over 80 stakeholders, including ICS strategic leaders, operational leads, data leads, VCSE partners, and Health Equity Champions.
▪ Case studies and examples of good practice highlights that explore local innovations in-depth.
▪ Framework analysis aligned to the Child Health Equity Framework and programme objectives, assessing contribution to systems change.
Key Findings
Although direct attribution of system-level change to the CHEC programme cannot be established, triangulated evidence from interviews, documentation, and data review suggests that CHEC contributed to progress across the following domains.
Raising the profile of the social determinants of CYP’s health – During a period of wider system reform, including the establishment of the ICSs and the CORE20PLUS5, the CHEC contributed to embedding the social determinants of children’s health within local and national agendas (although this varied across the three ICS areas, with some having made progress on this prior to being part of the CHEC). Leaders we spoke to reported that issues such as poverty, housing, and school attendance are now more visible in long-term strategies, with children and young people no longer treated as an “afterthought” within local health systems, traditionally dominated by adult priorities.
Delivering interventions to address the social determinants of children’s health – Evaluation of the CHEC pilot initiatives – ranging from targeted interventions with underserved families in Cheshire and Merseyside and South Yorkshire, to a study of the potential for social value and corporate social responsibility in procurement to address wider social determinants of health in Birmingham and Solihull – highlights how initiatives guided by child health equity principles can have positive impacts on the health and wellbeing of participating children and young people, with the potential to reduce inequalities. Early findings from the targeted interventions suggest benefits for the at-risk groups engaged, while in Birmingham and Solihull, emerging partnerships between suppliers and community organisations show promise in strengthening support for local children and families. The ongoing challenge for health and care systems is how to focus on the upstream drivers of child health equity and design, deliver, and link services and initiatives in ways that match both the scale and the specific nature of local needs.
Strengthening governance and strategic priorities – The programme strengthened the focus on children and young people’s health within system-level discussions and supported ongoing work towards the re-prioritisation of children’s health alongside adult services. Through its collaborative approach and advocacy, CHEC complemented wider national and local movements to promote health equity, contributing to collective efforts that encouraged greater recognition of CYP within governance and planning structures.
Building sustainable data infrastructure – Each ICS area has developed or improved their approach to analysing, presenting, and acting on data which is equity-focused and relevant for equity in the social determinants of health. The dashboards created, or enhanced, as part of the CHEC are continuing beyond the programme and have set templates for wider adoption, showing how ICSs can integrate the social determinants of health into routine monitoring and commissioning.
Increased visibility and influence of CYP – the CHEC created formal mechanisms, including the development of the Child Health Equity Framework and the role of Healthy Equity Champions, which gave CYP a stronger voice within ICSs. While their input has not yet translated into consistent strategic influence, their presence has begun to shape conversations, interventions, and local planning, signalling the foundations for deeper involvement in decision-making. Champions across the programme gained skills, confidence, and networks, while also shaping interventions and policy priorities.
Embedding co-production and strengthening VCSE partner roles – The CHEC contributed to the strengthening of the VCSE sector as trusted partners of statutory services and young people. Organisations such as Chilypep in South Yorkshire demonstrated how sustained youth engagement can influence interventions, governance, and system-level strategies. However, there was limited evidence that VCSE partners were systematically included in decision-making and further development of the CHEC programme should consider how the VCSE, and the data they hold, could contribute more.
Developing a proportional, universal approach – Across the CHEC initiatives, local areas are demonstrating elements of a proportionate universal approach – providing universal services and support, with more help given to those in most need. This approach is essential for improving health and wellbeing for all children, reducing health inequalities through action on the social determinants of health, and improving outcomes for children and young people from underserved communities – core aims of the CHEC programme.
National visibility and influence – the CHEC has been referenced in the Hewitt Review, parliamentary committees, and other national forums and NHS conferences. This visibility reinforced local activity, helping ICSs secure senior buy-in and aligning child health equity with broader NHS and government priorities.
The report was lauched at the Kings Fund event on 25th November 2025 (attended by Wes Streeting). It is available on Barnardo’s webite. It is hoped this project (and the evaluation) will help shift the focus to addressing the social determinants of children’s health.
Mental health affects every community, workplace, and family, and Mental Health Awareness Week provides an important opportunity to reflect on the ways we can all help support positive mental wellbeing.
This year’s theme, “Taking action to support good mental health,” highlights the importance of creating supportive environments, improving access to help, and ensuring people feel listened to and understood. At M·E·L Research, this is reflected both in how we support our team and in the research and evaluation work we deliver with organisations across the UK.
the Marine Environment) project, funded by INSITE North Sea as part of the INSITE Phase 3 programme ( Phase 3 – Research Projects – INSITE North Sea). This collaborative initiative brings together a strong partnership of organisations, led by Prof Sian Rees at the University of Plymouth, in partnership with the University of Aberdeen, the National Decommissioning Centre, and specialist consultancy partners. Together…
When people think about the Invictus Games, they often picture medals, competition and international sport. But our independent evaluation of the Royal British Legion’s (RBL) Team UK Invictus Games Programme showed something much deeper at work: a carefully designed recovery journey that supports wounded, injured and sick serving personnel and veterans – and the people around them – long before and long after the…
It’s a been a big week for women’s sport in the UK. The Women’s Six Nations kicked off this past weekend, while the Lionesses took on a World Cup qualifier on Tuesday night in a repeat of the Euro 2025 final. Both matches aired on BBC One, underlining the growing prominence and mainstream appeal of England’s women’s teams in the last few years. This moment is part of a much broader surge in visibility and investment. From the UEFA European Women’s Championship 2022…
M·E·L Research is proud to be working with the University of York’s Heritage for Global Challenges Research Centre on the ‘Heritage and Cultural Capital in Contemporary Britain’ project (generously funded by The Leverhulme Trust (Grant: LIP-2021-003)). This important study builds on work conducted in the early 2000s, including the ESRC-funded ‘Cultural Capital and Social Exclusion’ project (2003–2005)…
I will preface this by saying I am old enough – despite looking about 12 – to remember the rise of online surveys, the ‘death’ of face-to-face qual (remember that, after COVID) and ‘Big Data Will Take Your Job’ chat. New tools and approaches emerge all the time and that is something to be celebrated – it pushes us forward.
There is a lot of excitement at the moment about AI in research. Some of it is justified. Some of it I am less enamoured with – certainly when factoring in the work we do at M·E·L Research. Used well, AI can save time. It can help with admin. It can help sort, sift, tag and summarise. And yes, there are probably…
M·E·L Research is pleased to be working with the Molly Rose Foundation on the second wave of a major research study exploring how children and young people encounter harmful content on social media, and how patterns of exposure are evolving over time. This project takes a uniquely in-depth look into four specific themes of harmful content: suicide, self-harm, depression…
M·E·L Research is expanding once again! Following a successful period of growth, we’re excited to announce two new opportunities for experienced research professionals. We’re looking for talented senior social researchers to join our team. If you’re passionate about using evidence and insights to make a meaningful difference to people, communities and public services, we’d love to hear from you.