Surrey County Council: Employee Survey
Surrey County Council commissioned an organisation-wide employee pulse survey as part of an established tracker survey programme that began in 2020. The programme was designed to provide regular, consistent insight into staff engagement, wellbeing, inclusion and organisational culture, and to enable the Council to monitor change over time.
The March 2025 survey represented the first pulse wave of that year and was intended to provide senior leaders with current evidence on employee experience during a period of organisational change. The findings were used to inform discussions at Corporate Leadership Team and Directorate Leadership Team level and to support workforce planning, leadership development and internal communications.
Approach
The project involved the design, delivery and analysis of an online employee pulse survey as part of the Council’s ongoing tracker series.
The questionnaire retained core questions from earlier waves to support longitudinal analysis, while remaining aligned with current organisational priorities. Employee engagement was measured using the Civil Service People Survey engagement model, with five agreement-scale questions covering pride, advocacy, attachment and motivation. Responses were converted to a 0–100 scale and combined to produce an overall engagement index score for the organisation and for sub-groups including Service Area.
Survey questions were structured into thematic sections aligned with Surrey County Council’s cultural outcomes and workforce priorities. These included employee engagement, inclusive and compassionate behaviours, experiences of discrimination, being ambitious and outcome focused, collaborative and trusting behaviours, and inventive and dynamic ways of working. Additional sections covered health and wellbeing, equality, diversity and inclusion, leadership visibility and communication, career development, learning and progression, and experiences of bullying, harassment and unacceptable behaviour.
Quantitative analysis was conducted at an organisation-wide level and by Directorate. Where question wording remained consistent with previous waves, trend analysis was undertaken to identify changes over time. Sub-group analysis was used to highlight variation in experience across the organisation.
Open-ended questions were included at key points in the survey. These were analysed thematically, with verbatim comments reviewed and coded to identify the main drivers behind levels of agreement and disagreement with core measures.
Outputs
The project produced a comprehensive senior-level report presenting findings from the March 2025 pulse survey.
The report included overall engagement scores, results by theme, Directorate-level comparisons, and trend data showing movement since earlier waves of the tracker survey. Findings were presented in a structured and consistent format to support interpretation by senior leaders. Areas of relative strength and challenge were clearly identified across engagement, leadership, communication, wellbeing, inclusion and career development.
Qualitative findings from open-ended questions were integrated throughout the report to provide context for the quantitative data. Verbatim employee comments were used to illustrate key themes, including reasons for pride or dissatisfaction, perceptions of leadership visibility, experiences of workload pressure, and views on organisational culture and change.
In addition to the overall report, Directorate-level outputs were produced, including comparative charts and heatmaps, to support local analysis and action planning. These outputs enabled Directorate Leadership Teams to identify specific areas of strength and concern within their services and to track their position relative to the organisational average.
Collectively, the outputs provided Surrey County Council with a robust, longitudinal evidence base to support strategic decision making, monitor progress over time and inform future waves of the employee pulse survey programme.
Latest News
M·E·L News
Collections inside and out: thinking differently about gardens, heritage and the visitor experience
September 2026
Last week, I had the opportunity to speak at Collections Inside & Out, a symposium hosted at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden, bringing together people working across gardens, horticulture, heritage, collections and interpretation.
I was, perhaps, a slight interloper among so many people with deep horticultural expertise but every presentation was incredibly interesting and I learned a lot – and broadly managed to follow the general flow of what was being said (still not 100% au fait with taxa…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
Elliot Simmonds to present at Collections Inside & Out Symposium
September 2026
We’re pleased to share that our Commercial Director, Elliot Simmonds, will be speaking at the Collections Inside & Out symposium at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden on 24 September 2026. Bringing together professionals working across heritage collections, gardens and landscapes, the symposium will explore the relationship between indoor and outdoor heritage and the opportunities created by thinking about them as part of a connected visitor experience.
Elliot’s session, “Integrating Indoor…
Read the full post
M·E·L News
M·E·L Research recognised for outstanding contribution to social value and ethical research
August 2026
M·E·L Research has been named the winner of the Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Value & Ethical Research 2026 at the UK Enterprise Awards.
The award recognises the values that shape both the work we choose to undertake and the way we deliver it. From building trauma-informed practices into our research to improving inclusion and reinvesting in the communities around us, social responsibility is part of how we operate every day.
Read the full post
Industry Insights
Progress, persistence and the gaps in suicide prevention knowledge
August 2026
New UK-wide research from M·E·L Research’s SPARK report shows improving mental health indicators alongside continuing exposure to suicide, widespread lifetime suicidal thoughts and significant gaps in practical knowledge.
Suicide prevention depends on understanding not only how many people are affected, but also how confident the public feel about recognising risk, starting difficult conversations and finding appropriate support. The Spring 2026 SPARK report from M·E·L Research brings these issues together, providing a detailed picture of attitudes…
Read the full post
Industry Insights
Preventing suicide before the fire starts
September 2026
Across Europe, we have seen devastating wildfires destroy homes, habitats and communities. They offer us a powerful analogy for how we think about suicide prevention.
When a fire is raging, everything must be done to put it out. Firefighters, emergency services and communities mobilise to save lives. But even when the fire is eventually extinguished, enormous damage may already have been done, and recovery can take years. That is why fire services don’t only fight fires. They also invest in prevention: identifying risks, educating people, installing smoke alarms, creating fire breaks and trying to stop…
Read the full post
Industry Insights
What if the evidence we need to prevent the next child’s death is on their phone?
September 2026
My son Jools was 14 years old when he died suddenly in April 2022. There was no note. There was no offline evidence that explained why he died. No one had seen or been aware of any adverse mental health issues, and at his original inquest the coroner could not be sure that Jools was in a suicidal mood. More than four years later, I am still trying to understand what happened to my son. Yet one enormous part of Jools’ life was not properly explored following his death: his digital world. Like almost every teenager, Jools had a life on his phone. Social…
Read the full post
