Enfield Council: Public Consultation – PRS Licensing Scheme
Background & Context
Enfield Council commissioned M·E·L Research to independently design and deliver a public consultation on proposals to introduce a new Selective Licensing scheme for privately rented homes across parts of the borough. The Council has an established programme of property licensing aimed at improving housing standards and property management in the private rented sector (PRS). Existing licensing schemes in Enfield included a borough-wide Additional Licensing scheme for smaller Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs) and a Selective Licensing scheme covering a number of wards. The Selective Licensing scheme for single household private rented properties was approaching the end of its designation period, and the Council was considering whether a new scheme should be introduced and expanded to additional wards.
The consultation sought to gather views on the proposed scheme, including the geographic scope, proposed licence conditions, licensing fees and discounts, and the objectives of the scheme. The Council also wanted to better understand perceptions of the private rented sector locally and explore alternative approaches to improving housing standards and addressing issues such as anti-social behaviour.
Given the wide range of stakeholders affected by licensing schemes, the consultation required engagement with multiple audiences including private tenants, landlords, letting and managing agents, residents, businesses, local organisations and neighbouring authorities. A key challenge was ensuring that the consultation reached a balanced cross-section of views, particularly from groups who may be harder to engage through traditional consultation approaches, such as private renters or residents who may not actively engage with council consultations.
Another important consideration was the potentially sensitive nature of the topic. Licensing schemes often generate strong views, particularly among landlords and agents who may have concerns about regulation, costs and administrative burden. The consultation therefore required an independent and transparent approach that allowed participants to share their views openly while ensuring that feedback was captured systematically and reported objectively.
Approach
M·E·L Research designed and delivered a multi-method consultation programme to ensure a broad and representative range of views could be captured. The consultation combined quantitative survey methods with qualitative engagement and stakeholder consultation.
Key elements of the research programme included:
Online consultation survey An online questionnaire was hosted on the Council’s consultation platform and promoted widely through council communications channels. The survey gathered views on the proposed licensing scheme, proposed licence conditions, licensing fees and discounts, and overall objectives. Respondents were also able to provide open-ended feedback on the proposals and suggest alternative approaches.
Face-to-face resident survey A borough-wide face-to-face survey was conducted with 612 residents using tablets. The sampling approach ensured representation by ward, gender and age, with wide representation across different ethnic groups. Based on the estimated adult population in Enfield, the achieved sample size provided a margin of error of approximately ±3.9%, enabling robust statistical analysis of residents’ views.
Online consultation meetings Three facilitated online consultation meetings were delivered and moderated by M·E·L Research. These sessions provided an opportunity for participants to hear about the proposal and discuss their views in a structured setting. The meetings included presentations on the proposed scheme followed by breakout discussions to capture detailed qualitative feedback. Participants were predominantly landlords and agents.
Stakeholder interviews In-depth interviews were conducted with key stakeholder organisations representing different perspectives within the sector. These included organisations representing landlords and agents, tenant advocacy groups, and partner organisations such as policing. Interviews explored views on the potential impact of the scheme, enforcement capacity, scheme design and potential alternatives.
Written responses and alternative engagement channels Participants were able to submit written responses via email, letter or social media, or provide feedback through a dedicated freephone helpline. These channels ensured that individuals who preferred to provide more detailed feedback or were unable to attend meetings or complete the survey could still contribute to the consultation.
The consultation was supported by a comprehensive communications campaign led by the Council, which included stakeholder outreach, targeted email communications, social media promotion, community engagement activities and media coverage to maximise awareness and participation.
Outputs
M·E·L Research analysed the consultation findings using a combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis techniques.
Survey data from the online and face-to-face surveys were combined and analysed statistically, including subgroup analysis by respondent type (e.g. private renters, residents, landlords and agents). Demographic data were also analysed to assess the profile of respondents and ensure broad representation.
Open-ended responses from surveys, consultation meetings, stakeholder interviews and written submissions were analysed using thematic analysis. Comments were coded against key themes to identify common views, areas of agreement and disagreement, and recurring issues raised by participants.
The final outputs delivered to Enfield Council included:
A comprehensive written consultation report summarising the methodology, engagement approach and findings from each consultation strand.
Detailed analysis of survey results, including subgroup analysis by respondent type.
Thematic summaries of qualitative feedback from consultation meetings, stakeholder interviews and written responses.
Appendices containing the survey questionnaire, demographic profile of respondents and full coded responses.
The findings provided the Council with an independent and evidence-based overview of stakeholder views on the proposed licensing scheme. The report was designed to inform decision-making by clearly presenting both quantitative results and qualitative feedback across the different stakeholder groups involved in the consultation.
Last week, I had the opportunity to speak at Collections Inside & Out, a symposium hosted at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden, bringing together people working across gardens, horticulture, heritage, collections and interpretation.
I was, perhaps, a slight interloper among so many people with deep horticultural expertise but every presentation was incredibly interesting and I learned a lot – and broadly managed to follow the general flow of what was being said (still not 100% au fait with taxa…
We’re pleased to share that our Commercial Director, Elliot Simmonds, will be speaking at the Collections Inside & Out symposium at National Trust Chirk Castle & Garden on 24 September 2026. Bringing together professionals working across heritage collections, gardens and landscapes, the symposium will explore the relationship between indoor and outdoor heritage and the opportunities created by thinking about them as part of a connected visitor experience.
Elliot’s session, “Integrating Indoor…
M·E·L Research has been named the winner of the Award for Outstanding Contribution to Social Value & Ethical Research 2026 at the UK Enterprise Awards.
The award recognises the values that shape both the work we choose to undertake and the way we deliver it. From building trauma-informed practices into our research to improving inclusion and reinvesting in the communities around us, social responsibility is part of how we operate every day.
M·E·L Research joined the British Dyslexia Association (BDA) at the House of Lords this week for the launch of a new report exploring the experiences of dyslexic young people who are not in employment, education or training (NEET).
Tamsin Maries, Senior Research Manager, and Elliot Simmonds, Commercial Manager, represented M·E·L Research at the event…
New UK-wide research from M·E·L Research’s SPARK report shows improving mental health indicators alongside continuing exposure to suicide, widespread lifetime suicidal thoughts and significant gaps in practical knowledge.
Suicide prevention depends on understanding not only how many people are affected, but also how confident the public feel about recognising risk, starting difficult conversations and finding appropriate support. The Spring 2026 SPARK report from M·E·L Research brings these issues together, providing a detailed picture of attitudes…
M·E·L Research is pleased to be supporting the Diocese of Manchester with an independent consultation to help inform its future leadership. The research will provide opportunities for people connected with diocesan life, as well as members of the wider community, to share their perspectives on the local context, priorities for the years ahead and the qualities that will be important in future leadership.
Across Europe, we have seen devastating wildfires destroy homes, habitats and communities. They offer us a powerful analogy for how we think about suicide prevention.
When a fire is raging, everything must be done to put it out. Firefighters, emergency services and communities mobilise to save lives. But even when the fire is eventually extinguished, enormous damage may already have been done, and recovery can take years. That is why fire services don’t only fight fires. They also invest in prevention: identifying risks, educating people, installing smoke alarms, creating fire breaks and trying to stop…
My son Jools was 14 years old when he died suddenly in April 2022. There was no note. There was no offline evidence that explained why he died. No one had seen or been aware of any adverse mental health issues, and at his original inquest the coroner could not be sure that Jools was in a suicidal mood. More than four years later, I am still trying to understand what happened to my son. Yet one enormous part of Jools’ life was not properly explored following his death: his digital world. Like almost every teenager, Jools had a life on his phone. Social…
